Beekeepers wear protective veils. Light-colored clothes help provide protection from stings. A few experienced beekeepers handle the bees and honeycombs with their bare hands.
Credit: © Shutterstock

You may have heard the phrase “Save the bees” before, but a vaccine for bees? That is something new! Honeybees in the United States have faced diseases and pests that have decimated the population. Bees are important and affect our daily lives. Bees pollinate plants and flowers, giving us food, medicine, and of course, pretty flowers. Recently, scientists at the Dalan Animal Health based in Athens, Georgia, created a vaccine to save the bees for real!

What is the vaccine for? We know about vaccines for the flu and COVID-19, this vaccine protects bees against American foulbrood. Since American foulbrood is caused by bacteria, the scientists figured out how to put the dead bacteria in the vaccine. When American foulbrood infects a hive, it causes the larva to be darker and gives the entire hive a rotten smell. American foulbrood can spread from hive to hive, wiping out colonies of 60,000 bees.

How do the scientists give the bees the vaccine? No, it isn’t a shot, and they will not have to invent little bandaids for the bees. The scientists put the dead bacteria into royal jelly, which is a sugar feed the queen bees eat. This process exposes the queen bee’s future offspring to the bacteria so the bees can make antibodies. Antibodies are proteins that help the immune system fight off bacteria and viruses.

A typical honey bee colony may include tens of thousands of workers. This photograph shows workers tending to honey stored in the cells of a honeycomb.
Credit: © StudioSmart/Shutterstock

Honeybees are important. They are vital to agriculture around the world. Without bees, the world would deal with more food scarcity. During their food-gathering flights, bees spread pollen from one flower to another, thus pollinating (fertilizing) the plants they visit. This allows the plants to reproduce. Numerous wild plants and such important food crops as fruits and vegetables depend on bees for fertilization. Honeybees pollinate nearly one-third of all food crops grown in the United States. Popular crops like almonds, apples, cherries, and pears require pollination from bees. Nearly three-quarters of all flowering plants rely on pollination from bees and other pollinators like butterflies and moths.

American foulbrood isn’t the only bee enemy. Bees are also declining in population due to climate change, disease, habitat loss, and pesticides. Beekeepers have given entire hives antibiotics to fight off diseases. However, the use of antibiotics can decrease beneficial bacteria and weaken the bees. Animals, mites, and human activities all threaten bees worldwide. There is also a disorder called Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), an unusual condition that destroys hundreds of thousands of honey bee colonies each year in the United States. While the vaccine protects against American foulbrood, bees are also in danger of dying from European foulbrood. Diseases caused by fungi, such as Nosema disease, are also a threat to bees. Scientists hope the success of this vaccine will lead to others protecting the future of the bees!

There are over 11 breeds of cats that can have black fur. The American shorthair, Bombay, British shorthair, Chantilly-Tiffany, Cornish Rex, Maine Coon, and Persian breeds are the most popular black cats.
Credit: © Eric Isselee, Shutterstock

Black cats are everywhere in Halloween decorations and movies. They are said to bring bad luck if you cross paths with them. But how did black cats become linked with the spooky, scary and unlucky? Somehow black cats got wrapped up in superstitions, joining ladders, spilled salt, broken mirrors, and open umbrellas indoors. However, in many cultures throughout history, black cats have been considered good luck.

There are over 11 breeds of cats that can have black fur. The American shorthair, Bombay, British shorthair, Chantilly-Tiffany, Cornish Rex, Maine Coon, and Persian breeds are the most popular black cats. Cats are a favorite pet of people around the world. Cats are intelligent and have an independent nature. These small animals can also be playful and entertaining. Many cats make affectionate, loyal pets, providing companionship for people of all ages. Tens of millions of cats are kept as pets worldwide. Surprisingly, cats were not always popular pets!

In Europe during the Middle Ages, the cat was considered a symbol of evil. Superstitious people associated the cat with witchcraft and the Devil. For this reason, people killed hundreds of thousands of cats. Although all cats were thought to be evil, black cats with their mysterious black fur contrasting with their yellow eyes were thought to be more evil than other cats. Black cats were believed to gather around witches, a superstition that stuck around for many years.

Experts believe that the destruction of so many cats led to a huge increase in the rat population of Europe and contributed to the spread of the Black Death, an epidemic of plague. This disease is transmitted to people by rat fleas. In the 1300′s, it killed from one-fourth to one-half of the people who lived in Europe. By the 1600′s, Europeans had begun to realize once again the importance of cats in controlling rodents. Cats gradually regained popularity. European explorers, colonists, and traders brought domestic cats to the New World during the 1600′s and 1700′s. Throughout the 1800′s, settlers took cats with them as they moved westward. Most cats in the United States and Canada today are descendants of these cats.

It is also said that in parts of in England, Ireland, Japan, and Scotland black cats were considered good luck. They were thought to bring prosperity and even love. Sailors often brought cats on ships to kill mice and rats that stowaway and eat their food supplies. They believed black cats brought good weather and a safe return home. They favored them over other kinds of cats.

Long before the Middle Ages, Egyptians worshiped Bastet, a cat goddess in the mythology of ancient Egypt. By about 1000 B.C., keeping cats as house pets became common. By this time, Bastet was usually represented as a woman with a cat’s head. Bastet became associated with fertility, love, and motherhood as her worship spread to other places in Egypt. She often carried a sistrum. The sistrum is a sacred rattle believed to keep evil away. Egyptians revered darker cats due to their resemblance to Bastet.

Black cats help scientists understand diseases. Researchers at the National Institute of Health discovered that black cats have genetic mutations that can make them disease resistant. Cats can get the same diseases that humans do including Alzheimer’s and cancer. Scientists study black cats to learn how to prevent and fight off these diseases in humans. Seems like black cats are pretty helpful!

James Webb Space Telescope image of NGC 3324
Credit: NASA/ESA/CSA/STScI

The first images from the James Webb Space Telescope have arrived! They are starry, stellar, and dazzling images of never before seen nebulae and star-forming regions of the universe. The images are quite the upgrade from the images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope, showing deep space in exquisite detail. U.S. President Joe Biden released the first images on Monday, June 11, 2022.

The James Webb Space Telescope was successfully launched into space atop an Ariane 5 rocket on Dec. 25, 2021. The James Webb Space Telescope, abbreviated JWST, is an observatory replacing some capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope. The Hubble Space Telescope is a powerful orbiting telescope that provides sharp images of heavenly bodies. Webb’s main mirror is 6.5 meters (21 feet) across. Webb will have about seven times larger light-collecting area than Hubble. However, Webb is designed to study infrared light, a type of light wave with longer wavelengths than those of visible light. Thus, Webb will not replace Hubble’s visible light capabilities.

Webb is a collaboration between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the European Space Agency (ESA), and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). The Space Telescope Science Institute, which currently operates Hubble, is managing Webb’s science operations. The telescope is named after James Webb, the former NASA administrator who conceived and directed the Apollo program for most of the 1960’s. Webb has been a work in progress since 1996 and its deployment was delayed many times over the years.

The Webb telescope will enable scientists to study the history of the universe, nearly all the way back to a cosmic explosion called the big bang. It will collect information on the first stars and galaxies that formed after the big bang, the formation of planetary systems, and the evolution of planets within the solar system.

Southern Ring Nebula
Credit: NASA/ESA/CSA/STScI

The first images NASA released show a star-forming region in the Milky Way called the Carina Nebula captured in infrared light. A nebula is a cloud of dust particles and gases in space. The term nebula comes from the Latin word for cloud. Other images show the Southern Ring Nebula in near-infrared light and mid-infrared light. This image shows the remains of a white dwarf star, similar to our Sun.

Webb is equipped with several specialized cameras and spectrometers, instruments that spread out light into a band of wavelengths called a spectrum. Astronomers can study such a spectrum for signs of light given off by certain molecules or atoms. Webb also has a primary (main) mirror made of many segments, which was folded up to fit in the launch rocket. The mirror is to unfold and adjust to its proper shape before Webb reaches its permanent orbit. A large sun shield, about the size of a tennis court, will help prevent the infrared light from the sun, and the reflected sunlight from Earth and the moon, from interfering with observations. Webb is specifically designed to cool down its sensors to gather better data.

After launch, Webb traveled to a Lagrange point, a special point in space where the gravitational pulls of the sun and Earth are in balance. Webb is to remain there, 930,000 miles (1.5 million kilometers) from Earth, observing the skies for up to 10 years. During its primary mission, Webb is designed to be the world’s premier space observatory, used by thousands of astronomers worldwide.

Plants grown in simulated lunar soil on the left and in Apollo sample on the right, seen 16 days after planting.
Credit: Tyler Jones, UF/IFAS

Well, not exactly. Scientists recently grew plants in lunar soil for the first time in history. The lunar soil, also called moon dust, was brought back from three Apollo missions. Scientists from the University of Florida planted thale cress in the moon dust and compared the growth to materials found on Earth’s surface, such as volcanic ash. Thale cress is a small, bitter-tasting plant similar to broccoli, cauliflower, and kale. After two days, the seeds had germinated (grown). However, the plants in moon soil did not thrive compared to the plants in Earth soil after six days.

Lunar soil is very different from the soil on Earth. Soil is the mixture of minerals, organic matter, and other materials that covers most of Earth’s land. Soil is a storehouse of nutrients and the decayed remains of organisms (living things). Lunar soil is more dusty and is not made up of decayed organisms, so it does not contain as many nutrients compared to soil found on Earth. Impacts of micrometeoroids (tiny meteoroids‘) grind the surface rocks into a fine, dusty powder known as regolith. Regolith overlies all the bedrock on the moon. Because regolith forms as a result of exposure to space, the longer a rock is exposed, the thicker the regolith that forms on it.

National Aeronautics and Space Association (NASA) granted the scientists 12 grams of lunar soil for the experiment because it is precious and cannot be wasted. The soil brought back from Apollo 11 was not as strong as the soil brought back from Apollo 12 and 17. The scientists believe soil from Apollo 11 was damaged by cosmic rays and radiation from solar wind on the moon’s surface. Scientists have already started planning where they could find better moon soil where lava flow has enriched the soil.

For years, scientists have wondered whether the moon could support life. If humans were to survive on the moon permanently, they would need to grow plants for food. Although the experiment did not prove that the moon could sustain life, it gives hope that there could be vegetation on the moon someday. We are one step closer to growing an herb garden on the moon!

The killer whale, shown in this photograph, has a glossy black back, a white underside, and a white patch near each eye. Its powerful, swift body helps make it an effective predator.
© Brandon Cole, Alamy Images

Australian scientists reported in January 2022 their observations on three instances where a pod of orcas viciously attacked, killed, and consumed a blue whale—the largest of all animals. The scientists described the attacks as “the biggest predation event on Earth,” the likes of which may not have occurred since the age of the dinosaurs. The titanic battles also settled a long-standing debate among scientists on whether gigantic blue whales could be vulnerable to the ocean’s top predators.

The blue whale is the largest animal that has ever lived. An adult reaches up to 100 feet (30 meters) long and can weigh over 150 tons (135 metric tons)—larger than even the largest dinosaur. Orcas, also known as killer whales, are apex predators at the top of the food chain in every ocean of the world. Adult males typically measure from 19 to 27 feet (6 to 8 meters) long and weigh 4 to 10 tons (3.6 to 9 metric tons). Females are usually somewhat smaller. They often travel in groups, called pods, up to dozens of animals, usually led by an adult female. Orcas feed on a wide variety of ocean animals, but some pods are known to specialize in hunting large whales.

The scientists reported their observation of three separate orca attacks on blue whales that took place from 2019 through 2021 off Bremer Bay in Western Australia. In two of the attacks, a large pod of orcas was seen to attack, kill, and consume blue whale calves up to about 40 feet (12 meters) in length. A third attack was observed on a fully grown adult blue whale about 72 feet (22 meters) long. Up to 12 orcas cooperated in a gruesome hour-long attack led by 8 adult females as dozens of juvenile orcas circled about. The orcas attacked as a pack, biting and ripping flesh from the enormous whale as it desperately tried to flee. The scientists watched as one orca forced its way into the dying giant’s mouth to tear away and eat its massive tongue. Once the blue whale expired, about 50 orcas surrounded the great beast to feast on the carcass.

Orcas have been observed hunting every kind of large whale in coordinated packs, much like wolves. However, orcas are almost always observed preying on calves, rather than fully grown adults. More than three times their body size, an adult blue whale poses a formidable and dangerous challenge to any orca that dares attack. Scientists also believed that taking such large prey must have relied on attacks led by the larger males in the pod.

Now, scientists have observed that orca attacks against adult blue whales are successful and are often led by females. They believe that such predation by orcas may have been more common in the past before the blue whale population was decimated by whaling in the past 150 years. Such attacks may be led by mature females who have learned coordinated pack techniques to take down large prey.

Kenyan-born paleoanthropologist Richard Leakey and his team discovered many prehistoric human fossils at Lake Turkana, Kenya. In this photograph, he is holding near-complete fossil skulls of Homo erectus, left, and Homo habilis, right.
Credit: © Chip Hires, Gamma-Rapho/Getty Images

Famed scientist, conservationist, and politician Richard Leakey passed away aged 77 on Jan. 2, 2022 at his home outside Nairobi, Kenya. The remarkable fossils of prehistoric human ancestors discovered by Leakey and his colleagues firmly established the origins of humanity in Africa.  

Richard Erskine Frere Leakey was born on Dec. 19, 1944 in Nairobi. He was the son of distinguished British anthropologists Louis and Mary Leakey, whose excavations at Olduvai Gorge in northern Tanzania uncovered fossils of an early human ancestor they named Homo habilis. Louis Leakey argued that Homo habilis was one of the earliest types of human beings. Other scientists were skeptical, thinking that our own species likely originated in other regions.  

As a child, Richard grew up at excavation sites in Olduvai Gorge run by his parents. As a rebellious teen, however, Richard Leakey was determined to stay out of the “family business” of searching for fossils of early human ancestors. He dropped out of school and worked for a time leading safaris. While flying his own airplane over a region of northern Kenya around Lake Turkana, he recognized landscapes that likely held abundant fossils. Leading his own team of fossil hunters, Richard discovered several fossils of human ancestors, including a nearly complete skull that he recognized as Homo habilis. This species is now considered by most anthropologists to be one of the earliest types of human beings. Homo habilis lived in Africa about 2 million years ago. 

In 1984, a member of Leakey’s team, Kamoya Kimeu, found an almost complete skeleton of a young man at a site called Nariokotome near Lake Turkana that dates about 1.6 million years ago. The skeleton was classified in the species Homo erectus, a prehistoric human ancestor known from fossils first discovered in the 1800’s in Asia and later in Europe. The well-preserved fossil skeleton demonstrates that Homo erectus had a larger brain compared to Homo habilis, and first appeared in Africa. The more intelligent Homo erectus was able to adapt to new environments and migrate out of the ancestral African homeland.  

From 1968 to 1989, Richard directed the National Museums of Kenya while he and his team continued fieldwork in the Lake Turkana region, discovering many important fossils of human ancestors. From 1990 to 1994, and briefly again in 1998, he headed the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS). In that position, he worked to eliminate the illegal killing of Kenyan elephants for their tusks, a source of ivory. In 1995, Leakey helped found a Kenyan political party called Safina, to challenge the ruling Kenya African National Union (Kanu) party.  

Since 2002, Leakey has been a professor of anthropology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. There, he led the Turkana Basin Institute responsible for continuing fieldwork in the Lake Turkana region. In 2004 he founded the conservation organization WildlifeDirect and also returned as head of the KWS from 2015 until 2018. 

October 11, 2019

Every year in the first week of October, the Nobel Foundation in Sweden awards Nobel Prizes to artists, economists, scientists, and peace workers who—in keeping with the vision of the Swedish chemist and industrialist Alfred Nobel—have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind. Today, World Book looks at the first three prizes, in the scientific categories of physiology or medicine, physics, and chemistry.

Nobel Prize medal (Credit: Nobel Foundation)

On Monday, October 7, 2019, the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine was given jointly to the scientists William G. Kaelin, Jr., Sir Peter J. Ratcliffe, and Gregg L. Semenza for their work showing how cells adapt to the changing availability of oxygen. Kaelin, Ratcliffe, and Semenza identified the molecular machinery that allows cells to respond to changes in oxygen levels. Their discoveries offer promising new strategies in the treatment of such diseases and maladies as anemia, cancer, heart attacks, and strokes.

William G. Kaelin, Jr., was born in New York and is a professor of medicine at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston and at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital at Harvard Medical School. Peter J. Ratcliffe of the United Kingdom is the director of clinical research at the Francis Crick Institute in London and director of the Target Discovery Institute at the University of Oxford. Gregg L. Semenza, also from New York, is a professor of genetic medicine at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.

On Tuesday, October 8, the Nobel Foundation announced the prize for physics had been awarded to the Canadian-American cosmologist James Peebles and to the Swiss scientists Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz for their work on explaining the evolution of the universe and for discovering distant exoplanets (planets beyond our solar system). Among other things, Peebles theorized how matter in the young universe swirled into galaxies. In 1995, Mayor and Queloz discovered an exoplanet orbiting a star elsewhere in our home galaxy, the Milky Way, enhancing the study of planetary systems beyond our own that could support life.

James Peebles is the Albert Einstein professor of science at Princeton University in New Jersey. Michel Mayor is an astrophysicist and professor emeritus of astronomy at the University of Geneva. Didier Queloz is a professor of physics at the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University, and at the University of Geneva.

On Wednesday, October 9, the Nobel Foundation announced that John B. Goodenough of the United States, M. Stanley Whittingham of the United Kingdom, and Akira Yoshino of Japan would share the prize for chemistry for developing and refining rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. The lightweight, rechargeable, and powerful batteries are used in everything from mobile phones to laptop computers and electric vehicles. They can also store great amounts of energy from solar and wind power, further enabling the possibility of a fossil fuel-free future.

At 97 years old, John B. Goodenough is the oldest ever recipient of the Nobel Prize. He is currently the Virginia H. Cockrell Chair in Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. M. Stanley Whittingham is a distinguished professor at Binghamton University, State University of New York. Akira Yoshino is an honorary fellow at Tokyo’s Asahi Kasei Corporation and a professor at Meijo University in Nagoya, Japan.

September 30, 2019

Last month, in late August, scientists published a description of a 3.8-million-year-old fossil skull, allowing people to gaze into the face of perhaps our earliest ancestor, Australopithecus anamensis. According to one researcher, the remarkable fossil is the most complete skull of the “oldest-known species” of the human evolutionary tree. The important fossil helps define the ancient human evolutionary family, but it also brings more questions to the often cloudy relationships among that family’s members.

Paleontologists discovered the near-complete skull of Australopithecus anamensis in Ethiopia in 2016. Credit: © Dale Omori, Cleveland Museum of Natural History

A. anamensis belongs to the hominin group of living things that includes human beings and early humanlike ancestors. A team of paleontologists led by Yohannes Haile-Selassie from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History found the hominin skull in 2016 at a site called Woranso-Mille in the Afar region of Ethiopia. The fossil, officially known as MRD-VP-1/1 (MRD for short), was discovered in two halves that fit together, making up a nearly complete skull. The skull’s position in volcanic sediments enabled scientists to determine its age—3.8 million years—with great precision. The anatomical features of the skull helped identify it as A. anamensis, one of the earliest known hominin species. This species was first identified from a handful of fossil skull fragments and other bones discovered at Lake Turkana in northern Kenya in the 1990’s. Those specimens are between 4.2 million and 3.9 million years old.

Scientists used the fossilized Australopithecus anamensis skull to create this image of one of humankind’s earliest ancestors. Credit: © John Gurche/Matt Crow, Cleveland Museum of Natural History

The MRD skull shows that A. anamensis had a small brain, a bit smaller than that of a modern chimpanzee. The skull more closely resembles an ape than a modern human, with a large jaw and prominent cheekbones, but the canine teeth are much smaller and more humanlike. And, like humans, A. anamensis walked upright on two legs. Sediments and other fossils show that the region where the skull was found was arid, but the ancient creature died in a vegetated area near a small stream that entered a lake.

The site in Ethiopia where MRD was discovered is not far from the village of Hadar, where fossils of another early hominin, Australopithecus afarensis, were first discovered in 1974. A. afarensis is known mainly from the partial skeleton of an adult female, the famous “Lucy,” found in deposits dating to about 3.2 million years ago. Other A. afarensis fossils date to nearly 3.8 million years ago, which suggests Lucy and her kind may have coexisted with A. anamensis.

Most scientists, however, think that Lucy and her kind evolved from A. anamensis, and that the transition occurred as one species disappeared and the other took over. Scientists now understand that A. anamensis could still be ancestral to Lucy, but that other A. anamensis populations continued to thrive unchanged as her neighbors. The prehistoric landscape of East Africa had many hills, steep valleys, volcanoes, lava flows, and rifts that could easily have isolated populations over many generations. Over time, the populations eventually diverged. Scientists think that one of these species eventually gave rise to Homo, the human genus.

July 15, 2019

Food fads come and go every year, but for most Americans, meat always has a starring role on the dinner plate. Our meat habit has a cost, however: it can harm both our health and the environment. Cutting back on meat consumption, or cutting meat out completely, goes a long way toward helping the environment and our bodies—as well as the animals butchered for meat. Searching for meat alternatives, several food industry startups are offering new forms of meat and meat substitutes that are redefining meat as we know it—and they may change forever the way we produce and consume food. Lab-grown meat or plant-based substitutes are now often indistinguishable from the flesh of animals, and the future of meat may be one that does not involve animals at all.

New lab-grown and plant-based meats offer alternatives to traditional meats such as the beef used to make this hamburger. Credit: © Brent Hofacker, Shutterstock

Most nutritionists consider meat to be an important component of a well-balanced diet. Meat supplies vitamins, minerals, and fats necessary for good health and growth. Meat also provides an especially good source of protein. However, meat is not universal in the American diet. Many vegetarians avoid eating meat because they believe it is wrong to kill animals for food or they consider meat to be unhealthy. Many vegetarians, however, will consume such animal products as cheese and eggs. Vegans, on the other hand, eat an entirely plant-based diet and avoid all foods derived from animals, including honey and milk.

In the United States, per capita (per person) meat consumption has grown steadily to about 95 pounds (43 kilograms) per year—more than double the amount consumed in 1960. Each year, the United States raises more than 30 million beef cattle, 73 million hogs, and a staggering 9 billion chickens. The feeding, housing, transportation, and processing of these animals into food is a global industry consuming enormous amounts of energy resources and creating vast amounts of pollution. The meat industry is also one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.

Lab-grown or cell-cultured meats may soon rival traditional meats in U.S. supermarkets. Credit: © Tony Hertz, Alamy Images

Food companies have created a variety of meat substitutes over the years, from veggie hot dogs and bacon to tofurkey (tofu turkey). MorningStar Farms, owned by food industry giant Kellogg, has been producing meat substitutes since 1975. Many people consider such plant-based products to be a healthier alternative to meat, especially such red meats as beef, pork, and lamb. In general, red meats have more saturated fat, which can raise blood cholesterol and contribute to heart disease. Medical research has shown that higher meat consumption is linked to a greater incidence of certain cancers. Until now, most meat substitutes have had limited appeal. Made with products like TVP (textured vegetable protein), a by-product of soybean oil production, these products are often found to be dry and lack the look, juicy texture, and taste of meat.

Meat substitutes have long included such products as tofu, a food made of soybean curds pressed into cakes or blocks. Credit: © Shutterstock

Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods, however, are food industry startups with new vegan-friendly products that are virtually indistinguishable from traditional meat. Beyond Meat makes its substitute beef using pea protein isolate, coconut oil, and canola oil in a ratio that mimics the fat and protein content of ground beef. Impossible Foods uses soy and potato protein, sunflower seed oil, and coconut oil. Other ingredients include water, salt, and methylcellulose, a substance derived from plant fiber that is widely used in the food industry as a thickener and emulsifier. (An emulsifier bind liquids in an emulsion, a mixture of liquids that do not dissolve in each other.) Beyond Meat uses natural coloring agents derived from beets to provide the juicy appearance of a rare-cooked burger. Impossible Foods uses genetically modified yeast to make soy leghemoglobin (also called a heme), a molecule identical to the blood-red pigment in meat, to provide an appetizing color, meaty flavor, and a juicy sizzle.

Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods hamburger substitutes have modestly better nutritional profiles compared to beef burgers. Both meatless products have fewer calories, slightly less fat, and similar amounts of high-quality protein. The meatless burgers also provide a modest amount of dietary fiber. Beyond and Impossible emphasize the benefits of their products for health, animal welfare, and combatting climate change. However, should we assume that such ultra-processed foods are always better?

In 2019, government health agencies in Europe and the United States released reports that linked higher consumption of ultra-processed foods to an increase in rates of obesity and cardiovascular disease. Such processed foods, including canned foods and most snacks, are made with highly refined ingredients and many additives to improve flavor, texture, and shelf life. Impossible and Beyond burgers are made from an extruded paste of mechanically extracted proteins mixed with vegetable and seed oils, spices, and other ingredients to add flavor and provide meat-like texture. Each lists at least 20 ingredients. Some health experts also worry that they may include several potential allergens that could cause problems for sensitive individuals, although there have not yet been any reported issues.

There is also a certain suspicion that tends to surround mass-produced food substitutes meant to replaced cherished favorites. While meat has a complex composition and structure—made up of amino acids (the building blocks of protein), fats, minerals, vitamins, and water all woven together—it is usually considered a single ingredient—a whole food that is proven safe to eat. Companies producing plant-based meat substitutes are not immune from being labeled “Frankenfoods” by advocacy groups if their production processes are too complex or secretive.

In 2018, the American hamburger chain Burger King began selling an Impossible version of their trademark “Whopper” hamburger in several Midwest cities on a trial basis. The chain has plans to make the sandwich available nationally by the end of 2019. Burger King will do a plant-based burger for European locations, too–but it cannot use Impossible burgers there because of the use of genetically modified yeast. In 2018, the European Court ruled that gene-edited crops are subject to the same strict regulations Europe has for genetically modified organisms (GMOs). European real food advocacy groups worry that products like the Impossible burger will increase public acceptance of genetically engineered food and highly-processed food over whole foods grown by farmers.

A food researcher tastes a hamburger patty made from meat grown in a laboratory. The patty was formed from protein strands grown by cattle cells cultured in a laboratory, rather than by slaughtering and butchering a cow. Credit: © Toby Melville, Reuters/Landov

As plant-based meat substitutes gain in popularity, some food industry experts believe that the future of meat is in cell cultures. In 2013, scientists in the Netherlands took cells from a cow and produced muscle fibers in a laboratory—the first lab-grown meat. That summer, they revealed their work to the world in a news conference. As the press looked on, a chef prepared the laboratory product into a hamburger. Today, proponents of lab-grown meat say the technology has the potential to produce real beef, pork, chicken, and fish grown from a small cell sample, eliminating the need for farms, feedlots, slaughterhouses, or even animals. Some animal-welfare groups favor this “cellular agriculture” because it diminishes the need to kill animals to provide food for human beings. They see cellular agriculture as a way to establish a more humane world without livestock farms and slaughterhouses.

New Harvest, a company headquartered in New York City, holds an annual conference on advancements in cellular agriculture. Connecting scientists and businesses, New Harvest helps to establish companies that produce cell-cultured food. The laboratory process reduces land and water costs and produces a fraction of the greenhouse gas emissions compared with factory farms. Companies in the United States and Europe are already producing cell-cultured foods. One of them is Muufri, which produces animal-free milk. Another is Memphis Meats, which introduced cellular-grown meatballs in 2016.

But will people eat a hamburger that was grown in a lab? Public perception is just one challenge facing lab-grown meat. To overcome the many challenges, cultured meat proponents are upfront and transparent about the technology and the manufacturing processes involved, emphasizing the many positive environmental and ethical benefits.

Another challenge involves how these products are overseen within the heavily regulated food industry. In 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized an agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to establish regulatory jurisdiction over the production of meat that does not involve animals. Under the plan, the FDA will oversee the collection and growth of cultured cells. The USDA will regulate the processing of those cells into meat and determine how the products will be labeled.

Before cell-cultured meats hit supermarkets, a range of other questions still remain to be answered. What sort of products will be available, exactly how healthy will they be, and what will they cost? Perhaps the most important question is: How will they taste?

November 24, 2017

Today, November 24, is Evolution Day, a celebration of the day British naturalist Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species on Nov. 24, 1859. The groundbreaking book presented Darwin’s theory of evolution. Since then, advances in various scientific fields have resulted in refinements of the theory. The main ideas of evolution, however, have remained largely unchanged.

Charles Darwin, a British naturalist, became famous for his theories on evolution. Credit: © Time Life Pictures, Getty Images

Darwin’s theory of evolution included several related ideas. These ideas included the belief that evolution had occurred and that most evolutionary change was gradual, requiring thousands or millions of years. Darwin also proposed that the primary mechanism for evolution was a process called natural selection. He said that the millions of species on Earth arose from a single original life form through a branching process called speciation. By speciation, one species can give rise to two or more species. The full title of Darwin’s book is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

Darwin’s theories shocked most people of his day. They believed that each species had been created by a separate divine act. Darwin’s book, which is usually called simply The Origin of Species, presented facts that refuted this belief. It caused a revolution in biological science and greatly affected religious thought. Since the book’s publication, religious groups have tried to discredit the theory of evolution because it conflicts with their religious beliefs. For example, they claim that the theory of evolution disagrees with the Biblical account of the Creation. Some people argue against the theory of natural selection because they believe it diminishes the role of divine guidance in the universe. Scientists—and science itself—fully embrace evolution, however, and use millions of examples as proof.