Behind the Headlines – World Book Student
  • Search

  • Archived Stories

    • Ancient People
    • Animals
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Business & Industry
    • Civil rights
    • Conservation
    • Crime
    • Current Events
    • Current Events Game
    • Disasters
    • Economics
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Food
    • Government & Politics
    • Health
    • History
    • Holidays/Celebrations
    • Law
    • Lesson Plans
    • Literature
    • Medicine
    • Military
    • Military Conflict
    • Natural Disasters
    • People
    • Plants
    • Prehistoric Animals & Plants
    • Race Relations
    • Recreation & Sports
    • Religion
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    • Terrorism
    • Weather
    • Women
    • Working Conditions
  • Archives by Date

« Miami Wins NBA Championship
New Egyptian President Confirmed »

Supreme Court Rules on Arizona Immigration Law

June 25, 2012

The Supreme Court of the United States today struck down nearly all provisions of a strict 2010 Arizona law that had served as a model for states attempting to crack down on illegal immigration. In a 5-3 decision, the court ruled that, for the most part, immigration policy must be left to the federal government.

The court unanimously let stand one of the law’s most contentious elements, often known as the “papers please” provision. This provision requires police to check the immigration status of people they stop for another crime if they have a “reasonable suspicion” that the detainees are in the country illegally. The court said overturning this provision would have been premature because Arizona police had not yet adopted this practice. At the request of the Department of Justice, federal courts had blocked Arizona from implementing the law. However, the court left open the possibility that this provision could be challenged later if implementing the provision results in “racial profiling.” Discrimination on the basis of race and ethnic background is unconstitutional.

The decision was a major victory for the administration of President Barack Obama, who had criticized the law for undermining “basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans.” Critics had charged that the law authorized discrimination against Hispanic Americans. Supporters of the law, who had argued that such action was necessary to counter the problem of illegal immigration in the state, praised the ruling on the “papers please” provision.

Among provisions of the law rejected by the court were those that:

  • made it a crime for undocumented immigrants to work or apply for work in Arizona;
  • allowed police officers to arrest people without a warrant solely on the suspicion that the people were undocumented immigrants;
  • made it a state requirement that immigrants register with the federal government;
  • required immigrants to carry their alien registration papers at all times.

In its decision, the court recognized that while Arizona might have “understandable frustrations with the problems caused by illegal immigration … the state may not pursue policies that undermine federal law.” Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the ruling, presumably because she worked on the case during her tenure as President Obama’s first solicitor general.

U.S. Border Patrol members ride all-terrain vehicles near El Paso, Texas, looking for signs of illegal immigration and other crimes. Juarez, Mexico, rises in the background. (© Jim Young, Reuters/Landov)

Arizona is one of many states that have passed strict anti-immigration laws in recent years. Those laws will now come under additional scrutiny in light of the Supreme Court decision.

Additional World Book articles:

  • Immigration 2010 (a Back in Time article)
  • Immigration 2011 (a Back in Time article)
  • Immigration Politics 2006 (a Special Report)

 

 

 

Tags: arizona, hispanic americans, immigration, racial profiling, u.s. supreme court


  • Most Popular Tags

    african americans archaeology art australia barack obama baseball bashar al-assad basketball black history month california china climate change conservation earthquake european union football france global warming isis japan language monday literature major league baseball mars mexico monster monday music mythic monday mythology nasa new york city nobel prize presidential election russia soccer space space exploration syria syrian civil war ukraine united kingdom united states vladimir putin women's history month world war ii