Brontosaurus.
Credit: © Emiliano Troco

Sauropods were the most spectacular of the dinosaurs. Their long necks supported small heads that took in needles and leaves. Despite such a nutrient-poor diet, they reached sizes and lengths unparalleled in any other terrestrial (land-dwelling) animals. How—and why—did they get so large? A recent study may have discovered a lead to unraveling the physiology of these amazing animals. 

Over tens of millions of years, the arrangement of the continents has shifted through the action of plate tectonics. Geologists can trace how a location has moved over the face of Earth to determine its paleolatitude. The paleolatitude is the position of a point on the Earth’s surface in relation to the equator at a time in the distant past. Both latitude and paleolatitude are measured on a scale of 0° (the equator) to 90° (the poles). Higher latitudes experience cooler temperatures and less sunlight in winter. 

Dinosaurs reigned during the Mesozoic Era—a time of warmer climates. Despite the planet being largely ice-free, regions near the poles still faced cold winters and weeks or months without sunlight. Nevertheless, dinosaurs have been found at high paleolatitudes, including in Antarctica and Alaska. At least some of these dinosaurs remained there through the winter. 

Sauropod fossils, however, are conspicuously absent from these polar locations. No sauropod fossil has been discovered from a paleolatitude higher than about 65°. Instead, these chilly climates were strictly occupied by meat-eating theropods and some plant-eating dinosaurs called ornithischians. 

Some paleontologists (scientists who study prehistoric life) suspected the absence of fossils suggest that sauropods preferred warmer climates. But others thought that sauropods might not have fossilized well near the poles for some reason, or that the fossils are still waiting to be discovered. 

A team led by Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza of the University of Vigo in Spain analyzed the paleolatitude of all the places where sauropod fossils have been found. The team published their findings last month in the scientific journal Current Biology. They determined that the absence of sauropods at high paleolatitudes was not due to incomplete sampling. Chiarenza’s team used models of the Mesozoic climate and found that sauropods preferred savanna-type habitats. Sauropod ranges were tightly constrained by the lowest predicted temperature. 

Why didn’t (or couldn’t) sauropods brave the cold? They might have cooled down too quickly, despite their massive sizes. Many theropods—and possibly some ornithischians—had downy or hairlike feathers that could be used to keep them warm. Sauropods lacked any such insulation. Furthermore, a sauropod’s long necks and tails might have lost heat quickly when exposed to bitter-cold winds. 

Sauropods buried their eggs in the earth to keep them at a stable temperature. But this method probably would not have kept the eggs warm enough in cold climates. In contrast, theropods sat on their eggs and ornithischians covered their eggs in rotting plants. Both of these approaches could keep the eggs warm even in cold climates. 

Chiarenza’s team proposes that sauropods did not possess as high of a metabolism as theropods and ornithischians. Historically, scientists have classified animals as endothermic (“warm-blooded”) or ectothermic (“cold-blooded”). Endothermic animals tend to produce more of their own body heat, while ectothermic animals tend to rely more on their environment for heat. This is a false division, since every animal is somewhat reliant on its environment for heat. But animals classified as endothermic can usually survive in cooler temperatures. Reptiles, the classic endotherms, are concentrated near the equator. 

In many ways, this makes a lot of sense. A lower metabolism would have enabled sauropods to survive on less food. Their huge size would cause them to lose less heat to their environment, much like a well-insulated building. Growing evidence suggests that the ancestor of dinosaurs and crocodilians (a group of reptiles) had a high metabolism, but crocodilians “slowed down” when dinosaurs took over most environmental niches. A similar changed might have occurred in sauropods as well, enabling them to attain colossal sizes. Sometimes slow and steady wins the race. 

Monster Monday
October 19, 2015

A hagfish protruding from a sponge (Credit: NOAA Okeanos Explorer Program)

The eel-like hagfish is a common but rarely seen sea creature that could have been dreamt up by H. P. Lovecraft, the 1900′s writer of horror stories. This fish is quite possibly the most grotesque of all deep-sea creatures. Nearly eyeless, hagfish have a round, jawless mouth surrounded by short barbels (fleshy whiskerlike growths) that they use to sense food. Its tongue-like radula has rows of sharp, horny spines. The hagfish uses the spines to bore into and scrape away the flesh of dead or dying animals. When hagfish come across a big carcass, such as a whale, they burrow into it and eat from the inside out, until all that remains of the whale is an empty skin.

One peculiar habit gives rise to a common nickname for hagfish: the snot eel. When disturbed, the hagfish defends itself by producing incredible amounts of sticky, gooey slime. Any predator that tries to bite a hagfish will be left with a mouthful of slime that chokes their gills. The Atlantic hagfish produces enough slime to fill a bucket in one minute. When the predator has fled, the hagfish wipes the slime off itself by tying its body in a knot that it then slips through.

Hagfish are very common in oceans throughout the world. As horrible as they are, hagfish are important scavengers that help rid the ocean floor of dead and decaying matter. Meals can be hard to come by in the deep sea, and hagfish have the ability to absorb nutrients directly through their skin in addition to through their mouth. This adaptation, thought to be unique among all fish, helps hagfish make the most of infrequent carcasses when they find them.

Polar bears are more distantly related to other bears than previously thought, according to new research. Scientists have long known that polar bears share a common ancestor with brown bears. Previous research had shown that the split between the two groups occurred relatively recently, about 150,000 years ago. But in new research, scientists found that the split took place much earlier, about 600,000 years ago. Thus, polar bears are more distinct from other bears than scientists thought.

The research helps scientists to understand the history of how polar bears have evolved (developed over many generations). Polar bears have many adaptations (features) that help them to survive on Arctic sea ice. These adaptations help to make them different from brown bears. Polar bears would have had to evolve these adaptations in relatively little time if they had split from the same ancestor as brown bears only 150,000 years ago.

The new research involved studying bear DNA, which carries hereditary information. Scientists compared the DNA of black bears, brown bears, and polar bears. Comparing the DNA enabled scientists to estimate the date at which polar bears and brown bears shared a common ancestor. Earlier research into polar bear origins used DNA from a different part of the cell. Most DNA is housed in the cell’s nucleus (a body at the center of the cell). However, a small amount of DNA is housed in mitochondria (tiny bodies in the cell that burn chemical energy). The earlier research used DNA from the mitochondria to estimate the first appearance of polar bears. The new research used DNA from the nucleus. This information provided more data about polar bear origins.

The hardy polar bear lives along the frozen shores and in the icy waters of the Arctic Ocean. Polar bears have a thick, white coat that blends in with the ice and snow. They swim strongly by paddling with their front legs and stretching their head forward. (Marvin E. Newman, DPI)

Scientists suggest the different estimates for the first appearance of polar bears may have been caused by later matings between polar bears and brown bears. Such mating is known to occur, especially when polar bear populations are under stress. Thus, the mitochondria results may record breeding between polar bears and brown bears about 150,000 years ago. In fact, the research suggested that polar bears have gone through several so-called bottlenecks, periods during which relatively few polar bears survived. These bottlenecks may have corresponded to reduced sea ice or other climate changes that made it more difficult for polar bears to survive. Polar bears are currently considered vulnerable to extinction because of a loss of sea ice caused by climate change, and scientists have shown that some polar bears and brown bears have breed in recent years. The research was published online in the journal Science.

Additional World Book articles:

The Great Meltdown (a special report)